Copyright © 2012 Danko Georgiev. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

1. M. O. Scully, B. G. Englert, and H. Walther, “Quantum optical tests of complementarity,” Nature, vol. 351, no. 6322, pp. 111–116, 1991.
2. H. Wiseman and F. Harrison, “Uncertainty over complementarity?” Nature, vol. 377, no. 6550, p. 584, 1995.
3. B. G. Englert, “Fringe visibility and which-way information: An inequality,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 2154–2157, 1996.
4. D. M. Greenberger and A. Yasin, “Simultaneous wave and particle knowledge in a neutron interferometer,” Physics Letters A, vol. 128, no. 8, pp. 391–394, 1988.
5. M. Chown, “Quantum rebel,” New Scientist, vol. 183, no. 2457, pp. 30–35, 2004.
6. J. G. Cramer, “Bohr is still wrong,” New Scientist, vol. 183, no. 2461, p. 26, 2004.
7. U. Sinha, C. Couteau, T. Jennewein, R. Laflamme, and G. Weihs, “Ruling out multi-order interference in quantum mechanics,” Science, vol. 329, no. 5990, pp. 418–421, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
8. S. S. Afshar, “Violation of the principle of complementarity, and its implications,” in Proceedings of the Nature of Light: What Is a Photon Conference, vol. 5866 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 229–244, San Diego, Calif, USA, August 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
9. S. S. Afshar, “Violation of Bohr's complementarity: one slit or both?” in Proceedings of the Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations Conference, vol. 810 of AIP Conference Proceedings, pp. 294–299, June 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
10. S. S. Afshar, E. Flores, K. F. Mcdonald, and E. Knoesel, “Paradox in wave-particle duality,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 295–305, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
11. V. Jacques, N. D. Lai, A. Dréau et al., “Illustration of quantum complementarity using single photons interfering on a grating,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 10, Article ID 123009, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
12. O. Steuernagel, “Afshar's experiment does not show a violation of complementarity,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1370–1385, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
13. W. G. Unruh, “Shahriar Afshar—Quantum Rebel?” 2004, http://axion.physics.ubc.ca/rebel.html.
14. L. Motl, “Violation of complementarity?” 2004, http://motls.blogspot.com/2004/11/violation-of-complementarity.html.
15. E. V. Flores, “Reply to comments of Steuernagel on the Afshar's experiment,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 38, no. 8, pp. 778–781, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
16. E. V. Flores, “Ether, the theory of relativity and quantum physics,” in Space, Time, and Spacetime, V. Petkov, Ed., vol. 167 of Fundamental Theories of Physics, pp. 147–155, Springer, 2010.
17. E. V. Flores and J. M. de Tata, “Complementarity paradox solved: surprising consequences,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 1731–1743, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
18. R. E. Kastner, “Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 649–658, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
19. R. E. Kastner, “On visibility in the Afshar two-slit experiment,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1139–1144, 2009.
20. A. Drezet, “Wave particle duality and the Afshar experiment,” Progress in Physics, vol. 1, pp. 57–64, 2011.
21. N. J. Gunther and G. B. Beretta, “Towards practical design rules for quantum communications and quantum imaging devices,” in Proceedings of Quantum Communications and Quantum Imaging III, vol. 5893 of Proceedings of SPIE, pp. 1–22, August 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
22. T. Qureshi, “Complementarity and the Afshar experiment,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0701109.
23. D. Reitzner, “Comment on Afshar's expriments,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0701152.
24. D. Georgiev, “Single photon experiments and quantum complementarity,” Progress in Physics, vol. 2, pp. 97–103, 2007.
25. D. Georgiev, “Exact mapping of quantum waves between Unruh's and Afshar's setup,” Progress in Physics, vol. 3, pp. 28–33, 2007.
26. D. Georgiev, “Quantum operator approach to Unruh's and Afshar's setups,” ICFAI University Journal of Physics, vol. 1, pp. 7–33, 2008.
27. R. P. Feynman, “Space-time approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 367–387, 1948. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
28. R. P. Feynman, QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter, Princeton University Press, 1983.
29. R. B. Griffiths, “Consistent interpretation of quantum mechanics using quantum trajectories,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 70, no. 15, pp. 2201–2204, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
30. R. B. Griffiths, “Consistent histories and quantum reasoning,” Physical Review A, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 2759–2774, 1996.
31. R. B. Griffiths, “Consistent resolution of some relativistic quantum paradoxes,” Physical Review A, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 621011–621021, 2002.
32. R. B. Griffiths, Consistent Quantum Theory, Cambridge University Press, 2003.
33. J. B. Hartle, “The spacetime approach to quantum mechanics,” Vistas in Astronomy, vol. 37, pp. 569–583, 1993.
34. J. B. Hartle, “What connects different interpretations of quantum mechanics?” in Quo Vadis Quantum Mechanics? A. C. Elitzur, S. Dolev, and N. Kolenda, Eds., pp. 73–82, Springer, 2005.
35. C. J. Isham, “Quantum logic and the histories approach to quantum theory,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 2157–2185, 1994.
36. R. Omnès, Understanding Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, 1999.
37. S. Gudder, “Hilbert space representations of decoherence functionals and quantum measures,” . In press, http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.1694.
38. C. J. Isham, N. Linden, K. Savvidou, and S. Schreckenberg, “Continuous time and consistent histories,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1818–1834, 1998.
39. R. De la Madrid, “Rigged Hilbert space approach to the Schrödinger equation,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 319–342, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
40. J. Townsend, A Modern Approach to Quantum Mechanics, University Science Books, 2000.
41. E. Hecht, Optics, Addison Wesley, 4th edition, 2003.
42. W. G. Unruh, “Comment on “Single photon experiments and quantum complementarity” by D. Georgiev,” Progress in Physics, vol. 3, p. 27, 2007.
43. J. W. Goodman, Introduction to Fourier Optics, McGraw-Hill, 1996.
44. D. Dürr and S. Teufel, Bohmian Mechanics: The Physics and Mathematics of Quantum Theory, Springer, 2009.
45. S. Goldstein, “Bohmian mechanics,” in Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006.
46. A. Zeilinger, “Experiment and the foundations of quantum physics,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. S288–S297, 1999.
47. R. P. Crease, The Great Equations: Breakthroughs in Science from Pythagoras to Heisenberg, W. W. Norton & Company, 2009.
48. N. D. Mermin, “Is the moon there when nobody looks? Reality and the quantum theory,” Physics Today, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 38–47, 1985.
49. K. von Meyenn, W. Pauli, “[2015] Pauli an Bohr” in Scientific Correspondence with Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg, a.o. Vol. 4, Part 3: 1955-1956, Springer, 2001.
50. E. Schrödinger, “An undulatory theory of the mechanics of atoms and molecules,” Physical Review, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1049–1070, 1926. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
51. J. Polkinghorne, Quantum Theory: A Very Short Introduction, Oxford University Press, 2002.
52. J. Al-Khalili, “The Illusion of Reality,” Atom, BBC, BBC Two, 2008.